Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

City: District of Columbia

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults who Binge Drink

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (25.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5%).
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:
45.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 45.4 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 45.4 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), District of Columbia has a value of 45.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (45.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.2).
Prior Value
(42.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

56.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 56.7 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 56.7 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), District of Columbia has a value of 56.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

City: District of Columbia Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 41 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (6.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Drink at School

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Drink at School

6.7%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.1%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Drink Before 13 Yrs Old

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Drink Before 13 Yrs Old

22.0%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (22.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.3%).
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Ever Drink Alcohol

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Ever Drink Alcohol

58.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (66.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 58.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(66.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (58.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.3%).
Prior Value
(60.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Ever Use Marijuana

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Ever Use Marijuana

43.0%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 43.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(39.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Exchange Drugs at School

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Exchange Drugs at School

22.6%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (25.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 22.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Teens who have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who have Used Methamphetamines

1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 1.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 36 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 1.8%.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (1.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Alcohol

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 43 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (15.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Cocaine

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Cocaine

6.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Ecstasy

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Ecstasy

7.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (7.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Heroin

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Heroin

4.3%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Inhalants to Get High

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Inhalants to Get High

13.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (13.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Marijuana at School

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Marijuana at School

7.9%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Marijuana Before 13 Yrs Old

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Marijuana Before 13 Yrs Old

17.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (17.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Marijuana: High School Students

Current Value:
20.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 20.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 43 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 20.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (20.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.2%).
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Prescription Drugs

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Prescription Drugs

13.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (13.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Steroids

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Steroids

4.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 4.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (4.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Youth who have Used Alcohol

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Youth who have Used Alcohol

11.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (11.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Youth who have Used Marijuana

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Youth who have Used Marijuana

2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Cancer

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
23.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 23.5 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 23.5 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), District of Columbia has a value of 23.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (23.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.4).
Prior Value
(25.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
13.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 13.9 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 13.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), District of Columbia has a value of 13.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (13.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4).
Prior Value
(14.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

26.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 26.9 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 26.9 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.6 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), District of Columbia has a value of 26.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (26.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.3).
Prior Value
(28.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
26.9
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 26.9 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 26.9 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), District of Columbia has a value of 26.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (26.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.5).
Prior Value
(26.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

City: District of Columbia Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

134.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 134.0 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 134.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 129.5 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 134.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), District of Columbia has a value of 134.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (134.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (136.3).
Prior Value
(136.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Cancer: Medicare Population

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

7.2
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 7.2 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 7.2 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), District of Columbia has a value of 7.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (7.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.8).
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

85.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 85.4% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 85.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

16.1
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 16.1 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 721 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 16.1 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.7 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), District of Columbia has a value of 16.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (16.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.6).
Prior Value
(20.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
78.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

34.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 34.9 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 34.9 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.5.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), District of Columbia has a value of 34.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (34.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4).
Prior Value
(35.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Digital Rectal Exam

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Digital Rectal Exam

70.4%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (70.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (67.9%).
Prior Value
(67.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

42.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 42.8 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 42.8 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 56.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 61.2.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), District of Columbia has a value of 42.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (42.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.8).
Prior Value
(43.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

77.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.3% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.5%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (76.3%), District of Columbia has a value of 77.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (77.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.0%).
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

City: District of Columbia Mammogram: 40+ years

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Mammogram: 40+ years

74.8%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (74.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (74.7%).
Prior Value
(74.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

40.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 40.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (40.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 10.2 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 10.2 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), District of Columbia has a value of 10.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (10.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8).
Prior Value
(10.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 79.2% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (77.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 79.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (79.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.3%).
Prior Value
(81.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Prevalence of Skin Cancer

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Prevalence of Skin Cancer

3.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.8% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (3.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

130.5
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 130.5 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 130.5 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 114.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 123.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), District of Columbia has a value of 130.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (130.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (131.3).
Prior Value
(131.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Prostate Cancer Screening

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Prostate Cancer Screening

38.6%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (53.3%), District of Columbia has a value of 38.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(53.3% in 2010)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (38.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (43.8%).
Prior Value
(43.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Diabetes

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.7%).
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Working Group (4%), the target has not been met.
Diabetes Working Group
(4%)

City: District of Columbia Adults with Pre-Diabetes

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Pre-Diabetes

10.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (10.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

21.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 21.6 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 21.6 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), District of Columbia has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (21.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.2).
Prior Value
(20.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the Diabetes Working Group (23.8), the target has  been met.
Diabetes Working Group
(23.8)

City: District of Columbia Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Diabetes: Medicare Population

21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (21.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

36.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 36.6% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 36.6% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Children with a Disability

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Children with a Disability

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 4.3%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Disability due to Health Limitations

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Disability due to Health Limitations

22.3%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.3%), District of Columbia has a value of 22.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), District of Columbia has a value of 4.8%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Disability

11.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 1.9%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 2.1%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with a Vision Difficulty

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 5.9%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Infants Born to Mothers with Only a Primary or Secondary Education

Current Value:
21.9%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (21.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.1%).
Prior Value
(41.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

15.6
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.0), District of Columbia has a value of 15.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (15.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.8).
Prior Value
(16.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens Sexually Active Before 13 Yrs Old

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens Sexually Active Before 13 Yrs Old

14.9%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (14.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who are Currently Sexually Active

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who are Currently Sexually Active

36.6%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (34.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 36.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (36.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.3%).
Prior Value
(42.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who are Sexually Active

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who are Sexually Active

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 28.5% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 31 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (30.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 28.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (28.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Alcohol/Drugs before Sexual Activity

Current Value:
20.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 20.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (20.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.9%).
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens with 4+ Sex Partners

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens with 4+ Sex Partners

21.7%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (21.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.9%).
Prior Value
(23.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Youth who are Sexually Active

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Youth who are Sexually Active

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (7.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults who have a Primary Care Provider

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults who have a Primary Care Provider

68.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (68.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.3%).
Prior Value
(70.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

69.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 69.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 69.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults with Health Insurance

96.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 96.1% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 96.1% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 96.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (96.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (95.7%).
Prior Value
(95.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults without Health Insurance

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Children with Health Insurance

98.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 98.6% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 98.6% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.5% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 94.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 98.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (98.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.3%).
Prior Value
(96.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Could Not See a Doctor Because of Cost

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Could Not See a Doctor Because of Cost

10.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (10.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Inpatient Hospital Discharges

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Inpatient Hospital Discharges

110,267
Discharge Events
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (110,267) is less  than the previously measured value (125,224).
Prior Value
(125,224)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Medicare Healthcare Costs

$8,187
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), District of Columbia has a value of $8,187.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia ($8,187) is greater  than the previously measured value ($8,058).
Prior Value
($8,058)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

226
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 226 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 226 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 140 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 125.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (226) is greater and better than the previously measured value (219).
Prior Value
(219)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Outpatient Emergency Department Visits

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Outpatient Emergency Department Visits

242,648
Visits
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (242,648) is less  than the previously measured value (351,301).
Prior Value
(351,301)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with Health Insurance

96.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 96.3% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 96.3% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (96.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.3%).
Prior Value
(96.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

City: District of Columbia Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

63.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 63.2%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (63.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (61.8%).
Prior Value
(61.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

24.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 24.5%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (24.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (24.4%).
Prior Value
(24.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,947.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 2,947.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 2,947.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,617.0 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,014.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), District of Columbia has a value of 2,947.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (2,947.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,274.0).
Prior Value
(3,274.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Primary Care Provider Rate

129
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 129 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 129 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (129) is greater and better than the previously measured value (126).
Prior Value
(126)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Households with an Internet Subscription

89.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 89.1% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 89.1% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 89.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
95.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 95.4% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 95.4% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.5% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 95.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Persons with an Internet Subscription

90.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 90.7% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 90.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 90.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults who Experienced a Stroke

2.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), District of Columbia has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
3.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), District of Columbia has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
71.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 71.1% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 71.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

Current Value:
37.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 37.5 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 37.5 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), District of Columbia has a value of 37.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (37.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.8).
Prior Value
(36.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
102.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 102.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 102.7 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 87.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 101.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), District of Columbia has a value of 102.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (102.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (101.2).
Prior Value
(101.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

City: District of Columbia Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Cholesterol Test History

87.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 87.5% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 87.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Heart Attack Prevalence

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Heart Attack Prevalence

2.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.4% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (2.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Heart Failure: Medicare Population

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia High Blood Pressure Prevalence

27.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 27.9% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.2% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 27.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (27.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.2%).
Prior Value
(27.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

City: District of Columbia High Cholesterol Prevalence

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia High Cholesterol Prevalence

30.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 30.6% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.3%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (35.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 30.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (30.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

29.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 29.8% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 29.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 57.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (57.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Hypertension: Medicare Population

59.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 59.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 59.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 59.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (59.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (58.0%).
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Stroke: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adult Condom Use

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adult Condom Use

59.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (59.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (59.7%).
Prior Value
(59.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Adults (18+) Who Had Influenza Vaccination

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults (18+) Who Had Influenza Vaccination

41.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (41.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (37.2%).
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

74.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 74.5% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 74.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (74.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.8%).
Prior Value
(70.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

73.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 73.5% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.6% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (71.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 73.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (73.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.2%).
Prior Value
(72.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults who had HIV Test

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults who had HIV Test

70.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (70.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.3%).
Prior Value
(71.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:
11.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 11.5 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 11.5 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), District of Columbia has a value of 11.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (11.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.1).
Prior Value
(11.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

1.4
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 1.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 1.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.9.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), District of Columbia has a value of 1.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (1.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.3).
Prior Value
(0.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

4.42
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 4.42 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 4.42 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.02 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.68.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), District of Columbia has a value of 4.42 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (4.42) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.08).
Prior Value
(6.08)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 49.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (49.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.0%).
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Do Not Use a Condom

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Do Not Use a Condom

29.9%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (40.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 29.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (29.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.9%).
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

2.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.2), District of Columbia has a value of 2.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (2.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.4).
Prior Value
(3.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

City: District of Columbia

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Babies with Low Birthweight

9.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (9.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Babies with Very Low Birthweight

1.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (1.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Infant Mortality Rate

5.0
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (5.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.9).
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

62.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (62.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.3%).
Prior Value
(70.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

2.6%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (2.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.5%).
Prior Value
(2.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)

City: District of Columbia Preterm Births

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Preterm Births

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (10.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

City: District of Columbia

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

20.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 20.8% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

6.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 6.4 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 6.4 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.7 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.6.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), District of Columbia has a value of 6.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (6.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.8).
Prior Value
(6.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

City: District of Columbia Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Depression: Medicare Population

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Frequent Mental Distress

12.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 49 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (12.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.8%).
Prior Value
(12.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia High School Students Who Attempted Suicide

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia High School Students Who Attempted Suicide

11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 11.9% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 42 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (10.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (11.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Mental Health Provider Rate

688
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 688 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 688 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 315 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 227.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (688) is greater and better than the previously measured value (626).
Prior Value
(626)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

14.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days

4.8
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 4.8 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 4.8 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (4.8), District of Columbia has a value of 4.8.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (4.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0).
Prior Value
(5.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Prevalence of Depression

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Prevalence of Depression

14.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.5% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (14.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens Bullied Electronically

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens Bullied Electronically

8.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.8% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (8.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens Injured by Suicide Attempt

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens Injured by Suicide Attempt

5.3%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 5.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (5.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who are Bullied at School

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who are Bullied at School

10.9%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (10.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Considered Attempting Suicide

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Considered Attempting Suicide

14.8%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (14.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.1%).
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Felt Sad or Hopeless

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Felt Sad or Hopeless

25.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (29.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 25.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (25.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.9%).
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Made a Suicide Plan

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Made a Suicide Plan

14.7%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 14.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (14.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.2%).
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adult Fruit Consumption

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adult Fruit Consumption

68.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (68.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (63.0%).
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adult Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adult Vegetable Consumption

87.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (87.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (81.0%).
Prior Value
(81.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teen Fruit Consumption

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teen Fruit Consumption

18.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 15.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 14.1%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 37 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 18.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (18.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2%).
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teen Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teen Vegetable Consumption

12.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 12.3% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 33 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (13.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 12.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (12.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.1%).
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Drink Soda

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Drink Soda

78.9%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (77.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 78.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (78.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (76.5%).
Prior Value
(76.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Diet Pills

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Use Diet Pills

5.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia Teens who Vomit or Use Laxatives

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Teens who Vomit or Use Laxatives

6.3%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (6.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Current Value:
41.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 41.2% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 41.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

Current Value:
46.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 46.2% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 46.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Disability

32.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), District of Columbia has a value of 32.7%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.8%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 5.9%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
13.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 13.9%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

7.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

City: District of Columbia Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults who Visited a Dentist

70.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 70.4% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (65.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 70.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (70.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.9%).
Prior Value
(67.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

City: District of Columbia Adults with No Tooth Extractions

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia Adults with No Tooth Extractions

70.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 70.5% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.6%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (59.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 70.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (70.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.1%).
Prior Value
(70.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.