Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink City: District of Columbia

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (25.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5%).
Prior Value
(22.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20001

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20001

24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20001 has a value of 24.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20001 has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20002

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20002

22.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20002 has a value of 22.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20002 has a value of 22.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20003

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20003

25.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20003 has a value of 25.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20003 has a value of 25.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20004

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20004

25.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20004 has a value of 25.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20004 has a value of 25.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20005

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20005

27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20005 has a value of 27.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20005 has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20006

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20006

26.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20006 has a value of 26.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20006 has a value of 26.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20007

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20007

25.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20007 has a value of 25.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20007 has a value of 25.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20008

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20008

24.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20008 has a value of 24.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20008 has a value of 24.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20009

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20009

27.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20009 has a value of 27.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20009 has a value of 27.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20010

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20010

24.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20010 has a value of 24.9% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20010 has a value of 24.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20011

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20011

19.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20011 has a value of 19.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20011 has a value of 19.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20012

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20012

18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20012 has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20012 has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20015

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20015

20.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20015 has a value of 20.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20015 has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20016

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20016

23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20016 has a value of 23.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20016 has a value of 23.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20017

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20017

18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20017 has a value of 18.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20017 has a value of 18.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20018

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20018

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20018 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20018 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20019

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20019

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20019 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20019 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20020

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20020

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20020 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20020 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20024

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20024

20.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20024 has a value of 20.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20024 has a value of 20.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20032

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20032

17.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20032 has a value of 17.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20032 has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20036

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20036

27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20036 has a value of 27.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20036 has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20037

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20037

25.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20037 has a value of 25.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20037 has a value of 25.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20052

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20052

28.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20052 has a value of 28.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20052 has a value of 28.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20057

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20057

28.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20057 has a value of 28.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20057 has a value of 28.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20064

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20064

27.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20064 has a value of 27.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20064 has a value of 27.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20307

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20307

35.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20307 has a value of 35.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20307 has a value of 35.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20317

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20317

5.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20317 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20317 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20319

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20319

40.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20319 has a value of 40.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20319 has a value of 40.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20373

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20373

35.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20373 has a value of 35.0% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20373 has a value of 35.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20390

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Zip Code: 20390

40.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20390 has a value of 40.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 31,435 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 20390 has a value of 40.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000100

23.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 23.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000100 has a value of 23.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000201

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000201

28.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000201 has a value of 28.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000201 has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000202

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000202

26.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000202 has a value of 26.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000202 has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000300

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000300

27.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000300 has a value of 27.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000300 has a value of 27.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000400

21.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000400 has a value of 21.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000400 has a value of 21.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000501

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000501

28.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000501 has a value of 28.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000501 has a value of 28.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000502

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000502

25.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000502 has a value of 25.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000502 has a value of 25.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000600

22.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000600 has a value of 22.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000600 has a value of 22.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000701

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000701

21.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000701 has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000701 has a value of 21.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000702

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000702

26.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000702 has a value of 26.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000702 has a value of 26.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000801

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000801

21.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000801 has a value of 21.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000801 has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000802

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000802

25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000802 has a value of 25.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000802 has a value of 25.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000901

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000901

25.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000901 has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000901 has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000902

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001000902

21.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000902 has a value of 21.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001000902 has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001001

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001001

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001001 has a value of 23.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001001 has a value of 23.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001002

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001002

25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001002 has a value of 25.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001002 has a value of 25.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001100

21.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001100 has a value of 21.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001100 has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001200

24.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001200 has a value of 24.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001200 has a value of 24.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001301

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001301

23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001301 has a value of 23.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001301 has a value of 23.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001302

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001302

24.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001302 has a value of 24.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001302 has a value of 24.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001401

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001401

23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001401 has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001401 has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001402

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001402

19.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001402 has a value of 19.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001402 has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001500

19.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001500 has a value of 19.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001500 has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001600

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001600 has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001600 has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001702

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001702

21.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001702 has a value of 21.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001702 has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001803

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001803

18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001803 has a value of 18.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001803 has a value of 18.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001804

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001804

17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001804 has a value of 17.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001804 has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001901

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001901

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001901 has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001901 has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001902

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001001902

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001902 has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001001902 has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002001

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002001

18.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002001 has a value of 18.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002001 has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002002

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002002

19.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002002 has a value of 19.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002002 has a value of 19.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002101

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002101

20.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002101 has a value of 20.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002101 has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002102

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002102

18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002102 has a value of 18.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002102 has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002201

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002201

19.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002201 has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002201 has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002202

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002202

20.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002202 has a value of 20.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002202 has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002301

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002301

20.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002301 has a value of 20.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002301 has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002302

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002302

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002302 has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002302 has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002400

21.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002400 has a value of 21.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002400 has a value of 21.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002501

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002501

20.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002501 has a value of 20.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002501 has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002502

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002502

23.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002502 has a value of 23.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002502 has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002600

19.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002600 has a value of 19.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002600 has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002701

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002701

25.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002701 has a value of 25.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002701 has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002702

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002702

26.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002702 has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002702 has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002801

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002801

23.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002801 has a value of 23.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002801 has a value of 23.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002802

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002802

24.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002802 has a value of 24.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002802 has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002900

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001002900

26.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002900 has a value of 26.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001002900 has a value of 26.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003000

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003000

24.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003000 has a value of 24.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003000 has a value of 24.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003100

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003100 has a value of 25.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003100 has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003200

22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003200 has a value of 22.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003200 has a value of 22.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003301

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003301

24.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003301 has a value of 24.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003301 has a value of 24.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003302

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003302

25.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003302 has a value of 25.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003302 has a value of 25.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003400

23.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003400 has a value of 23.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003400 has a value of 23.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003500

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003500 has a value of 23.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003500 has a value of 23.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003600

25.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003600 has a value of 25.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003600 has a value of 25.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003700

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003700

24.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003700 has a value of 24.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003700 has a value of 24.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003800

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003800

27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003800 has a value of 27.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003800 has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003900

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001003900

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003900 has a value of 28.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001003900 has a value of 28.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004001

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004001

27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004001 has a value of 27.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004001 has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004002

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004002

28.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004002 has a value of 28.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004002 has a value of 28.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004100

24.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004100 has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004100 has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004201

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004201

31.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004201 has a value of 31.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004201 has a value of 31.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004202

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004202

29.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004202 has a value of 29.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004202 has a value of 29.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004300

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004300

26.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004300 has a value of 26.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004300 has a value of 26.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004400

29.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004400 has a value of 29.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004400 has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004600

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004600 has a value of 23.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004600 has a value of 23.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004701

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004701

18.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004701 has a value of 18.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004701 has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004702

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004702

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004702 has a value of 23.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004702 has a value of 23.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004801

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004801

24.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004801 has a value of 24.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004801 has a value of 24.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004802

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004802

22.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004802 has a value of 22.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004802 has a value of 22.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004901

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004901

23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004901 has a value of 23.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004901 has a value of 23.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004902

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001004902

26.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004902 has a value of 26.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001004902 has a value of 26.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005001

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005001

28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005001 has a value of 28.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005001 has a value of 28.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005002

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005002

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005002 has a value of 26.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005002 has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005201

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005201

29.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005201 has a value of 29.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005201 has a value of 29.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005301

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005301

28.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005301 has a value of 28.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005301 has a value of 28.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005500

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005500 has a value of 26.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005500 has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005600

23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005600 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005600 has a value of 23.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005800

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005800

24.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005800 has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005800 has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005900

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001005900

25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005900 has a value of 25.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001005900 has a value of 25.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006202

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006202

0.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006202 has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (16.3%), 11001006202 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006400

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006400

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006400 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006400 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006500

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006500

25.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006500 has a value of 25.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006500 has a value of 25.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006600

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006600

26.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006600 has a value of 26.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006600 has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006700

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006700

26.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006700 has a value of 26.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006700 has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006801

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006801

23.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006801 has a value of 23.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006801 has a value of 23.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006802

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006802

24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006802 has a value of 24.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006802 has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006804

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006804

22.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006804 has a value of 22.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006804 has a value of 22.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006900

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001006900

25.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006900 has a value of 25.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001006900 has a value of 25.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007000

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007000

29.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007000 has a value of 29.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007000 has a value of 29.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007100

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007100

20.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007100 has a value of 20.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007100 has a value of 20.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007200

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007200

29.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007200 has a value of 29.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007200 has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007301

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007301

30.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007301 has a value of 30.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007301 has a value of 30.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007304

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007304

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007304 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007304 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007401

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007401

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007401 has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007401 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007403

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007403

17.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007403 has a value of 17.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007403 has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007404

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007404

19.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007404 has a value of 19.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007404 has a value of 19.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007406

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007406

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007406 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007406 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007407

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007407

17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007407 has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007407 has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007408

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007408

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007408 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007408 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007409

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007409

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007409 has a value of 16.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007409 has a value of 16.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007502

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007502

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007502 has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007502 has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007503

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007503

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007503 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007503 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007504

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007504

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007504 has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007504 has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007601

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007601

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007601 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007601 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007603

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007603

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007603 has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007603 has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007604

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007604

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007604 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007604 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007605

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007605

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007605 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007605 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007703

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007703

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007703 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007703 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007707

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007707

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007707 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007707 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007708

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007708

14.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007708 has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007708 has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007709

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007709

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007709 has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007709 has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007803

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007803

16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007803 has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007803 has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007804

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007804

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007804 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007804 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007806

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007806

16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007806 has a value of 16.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007806 has a value of 16.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007807

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007807

17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007807 has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007807 has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007808

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007808

15.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007808 has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007808 has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007809

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007809

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007809 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007809 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007901

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007901

18.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007901 has a value of 18.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007901 has a value of 18.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007903

Current Value:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001007903

18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007903 has a value of 18.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 68,167 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001007903 has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.