Home > Promising Practices > CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving: School-Based Instructional Programs

CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving: School-Based Instructional Programs

CDC

An Evidence-Based Practice

Description

School-based programs to reduce alcohol-impaired driving include instructional programs that can address the problems of drunk driving (DD) and riding with drunk drivers (RDD) alone, or have a broader focus on alcohol or other substance use.

The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends school-based instructional programs to reduce riding with alcohol-impaired drivers.

Results / Accomplishments

Results from the Systematic Reviews

Instructional Programs:
Nine studies qualified for the systematic review.
• Self-reported drinking and driving: median change of -0.10 standard deviations (range: -0.22 to 0.04; 5 studies)
• Self-reported riding with drinking drivers: median change of -0.18 standard deviations (range: -0.72 to -0.10; 4 studies)

About this Promising Practice

Primary Contact
The Community Guide
1600 Clifton Rd, NE
MS E69
Atlanta, GA 30329
(404) 498-1827
communityguide@cdc.gov
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/
Topics
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Adolescent Health
Source
Community Guide Branch Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Location
USA
For more details
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/motor-v...
Target Audience
Teens

Related Promising Practices

  1. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving: Ignition Interlocks
  2. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving: Mass Media Campaigns
  3. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving: Multicomponent Interventions with Community Mobilization

More

Related Content for: CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving: School-Based Instructional Programs

An Evidence-Based Practice meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes at a minimum: the sponsoring organization, program goals, program implementation steps, and outcomes that have demonstrated program success in achieving the program goal in one or more localities.
  2. The results from an evaluation of the program include quantitative measures showing improvement in the outcome(s) of interest after the implementation of the program (i.e. increase in smoking cessation, not just the delivery of a smoking cessation program). The outcome measure(s) is/are compared at relevant time periods before and after the intervention or program implementation. Alternatively, the evaluation study compares the outcome(s) between an intervention group and an appropriate control group.
  3. The study is of peer-review quality and presents numbers in a scientific manner; measurements of precision and reliability are included (e.g. confidence intervals, standard errors), results from statistical tests show a significant difference or change in the outcome measure(s), and relevant point estimates and p-values are presented. Note: if the results from an evaluation of a program are presented in a scientific manner and the outcome measure is improved compared to the baseline measurement or the control group but the difference is not statistically significant, the practice is classified as effective and not evidence-based.