Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Value
Compared to:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007603

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007603

92.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007603 has a value of 92.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007603 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007604

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007604

90.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007604 has a value of 90.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007604 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007605

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007605

92.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007605 has a value of 92.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007605 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007703

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007703

87.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007703 has a value of 87.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007703 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007707

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007707

81.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007707 has a value of 81.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007707 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007708

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007708

84.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007708 has a value of 84.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007708 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007709

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007709

77.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007709 has a value of 77.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007709 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007803

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007803

79.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007803 has a value of 79.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007803 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007804

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007804

80.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007804 has a value of 80.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007804 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007806

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007806

92.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007806 has a value of 92.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007806 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007807

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007807

89.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007807 has a value of 89.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007807 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007808

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007808

83.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007808 has a value of 83.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007808 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007809

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007809

79.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007809 has a value of 79.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007809 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007901

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007901

94.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007901 has a value of 94.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007901 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007903

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001007903

92.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007903 has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001007903 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008001

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008001

97.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008001 has a value of 97.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008001 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008002

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008002

98.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008002 has a value of 98.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008002 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008100

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008100

99.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008100 has a value of 99.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008200

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008200

99.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008200 has a value of 99.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008301

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008301

98.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008301 has a value of 98.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008301 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008302

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008302

96.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008302 has a value of 96.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008302 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008402

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008402

96.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008402 has a value of 96.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008402 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008410

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008410

95.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008410 has a value of 95.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008410 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008701

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008701

96.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008701 has a value of 96.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008701 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008702

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008702

96.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008702 has a value of 96.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008702 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008802

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008802

90.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008802 has a value of 90.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008802 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008803

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008803

92.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008803 has a value of 92.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008803 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008804

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008804

89.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008804 has a value of 89.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008804 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008903

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008903

89.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008903 has a value of 89.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008903 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008904

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001008904

87.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008904 has a value of 87.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001008904 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009000

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009000

88.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009000 has a value of 88.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009000 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009102

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009102

85.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009102 has a value of 85.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009102 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009201

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009201

95.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009201 has a value of 95.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009201 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009203

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009203

92.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009203 has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009203 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009204

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009204

80.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009204 has a value of 80.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009204 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009301

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009301

98.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009301 has a value of 98.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009301 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009302

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009302

91.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009302 has a value of 91.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009302 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009400

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009400

92.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009400 has a value of 92.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009501

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009501

80.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009501 has a value of 80.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009501 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009503

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009503

94.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009503 has a value of 94.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009503 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009504

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009504

95.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009504 has a value of 95.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009504 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009505

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009505

94.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009505 has a value of 94.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009505 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009507

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009507

93.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009507 has a value of 93.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009507 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009508

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009508

95.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009508 has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009508 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009509

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009509

92.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009509 has a value of 92.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009509 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009601

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009601

87.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009601 has a value of 87.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009601 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009602

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009602

83.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009602 has a value of 83.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009602 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009603

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009603

87.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009603 has a value of 87.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009603 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009604

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009604

90.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009604 has a value of 90.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009604 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009700

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009700

86.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009700 has a value of 86.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009801

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009801

65.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009801 has a value of 65.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009801 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009802

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009802

88.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009802 has a value of 88.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009802 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009803

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009803

82.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009803 has a value of 82.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009803 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009804

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009804

92.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009804 has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009804 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009807

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009807

89.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009807 has a value of 89.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009807 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009810

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009810

93.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009810 has a value of 93.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009810 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009811

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009811

79.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009811 has a value of 79.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009811 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009901

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009901

94.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009901 has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009901 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009902

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009902

90.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009902 has a value of 90.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009902 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009903

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009903

91.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009903 has a value of 91.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009903 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009904

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009904

93.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009904 has a value of 93.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009904 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009905

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009905

92.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009905 has a value of 92.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009905 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009906

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009906

91.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009906 has a value of 91.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009906 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009907

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001009907

77.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009907 has a value of 77.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001009907 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010100

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010100

99.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010100 has a value of 99.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010200

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010200

98.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010200 has a value of 98.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010300

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010300

86.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010300 has a value of 86.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010300 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010400

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010400

90.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010400 has a value of 90.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010500

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010500

92.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010500 has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010600

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010600

96.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010600 has a value of 96.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010700

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010700

97.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010700 has a value of 97.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010800

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010800

97.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010800 has a value of 97.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010900

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001010900

85.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010900 has a value of 85.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001010900 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001011000

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001011000

95.2%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011000 has a value of 95.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.2% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,386 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001011000 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001011100

Current Value:

People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher Census Tract: 11001011100

84.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011100 has a value of 84.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.4% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,720 U.S. census tracts.
Over time, the 11001011100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Student-to-Teacher Ratio City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Student-to-Teacher Ratio City: District of Columbia

11.3
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), District of Columbia has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (11.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.4).
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Math City: District of Columbia

22.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (22.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38.5%).
Prior Value
(38.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Reading

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

4th Grade Students Proficient in Reading

Value
Compared to:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Reading City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

4th Grade Students Proficient in Reading City: District of Columbia

30.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (30.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38.2%).
Prior Value
(38.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Value
Compared to:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Math City: District of Columbia

10.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (10.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Reading

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

8th Grade Students Proficient in Reading

Value
Compared to:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Reading City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

8th Grade Students Proficient in Reading City: District of Columbia

31.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (31.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (39.6%).
Prior Value
(39.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Annual Ozone Air Quality City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Annual Ozone Air Quality City: District of Columbia

5
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, District of Columbia has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Annual Particle Pollution City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Annual Particle Pollution City: District of Columbia

3
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, District of Columbia has a value of 3 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3).
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Air

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Value
Compared to:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air City: District of Columbia

68
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (68) is less and better than the previously measured value (377).
Prior Value
(377)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20002

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20002

11
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20002 (11) is less and better than the previously measured value (104).
Prior Value
(104)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20002 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20003

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20003

0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20003 (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20003 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20011

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20011

0
Pounds
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20011 (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20011 value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20018

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20018

58
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20018 (58) is less and better than the previously measured value (273).
Prior Value
(273)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20018 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20019

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20019

0
Pounds
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20019 (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20032

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20032

0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20032 (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20032 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20228

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air Zip Code: 20228

0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20228 (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20228 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities City: District of Columbia

100.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.7%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), District of Columbia has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (100.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (100.0%).
Prior Value
(100.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Access to Parks City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Access to Parks City: District of Columbia

99.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (99.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (97.9%).
Prior Value
(97.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Food Environment Index City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Food Environment Index City: District of Columbia

8.5
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 8.5 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 8.5 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.8 while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.8.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), District of Columbia has a value of 8.5 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (8.5) is less and worse than the previously measured value (8.7).
Prior Value
(8.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Proximity to Highways City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Proximity to Highways City: District of Columbia

12.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (12.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

PBT Released City: District of Columbia

Current Value:
378
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (378) is less and better than the previously measured value (696).
Prior Value
(696)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released Zip Code: 20002

Current Value:

PBT Released Zip Code: 20002

11
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20002 (11) is less and better than the previously measured value (104).
Prior Value
(104)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20002 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released Zip Code: 20003

Current Value:

PBT Released Zip Code: 20003

0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20003 (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20003 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released Zip Code: 20011

Current Value:

PBT Released Zip Code: 20011

5
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20011 (5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3).
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20011 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released Zip Code: 20018

Current Value:

PBT Released Zip Code: 20018

58
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20018 (58) is less and better than the previously measured value (273).
Prior Value
(273)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20018 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released Zip Code: 20032

Current Value:

PBT Released Zip Code: 20032

184
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20032 (184) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20032 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released Zip Code: 20228

Current Value:

PBT Released Zip Code: 20228

55
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20228 (55) is less and better than the previously measured value (246).
Prior Value
(246)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20228 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

PBT Released Zip Code: 20460

Current Value:

PBT Released Zip Code: 20460

65
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, 20460 (65) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (46).
Prior Value
(46)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the 20460 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Value
Compared to:

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance City: District of Columbia

2,495.0
Joule per square meter
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (2,495.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,425.0).
Prior Value
(2,425.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Days City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Days City: District of Columbia

30
Days
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (30) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Events City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Events City: District of Columbia

5
Events
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Value
Compared to:

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse City: District of Columbia

0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (0) is less and better than the previously measured value (7).
Prior Value
(7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.