Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening

Value
Compared to:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004600

71.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004600 has a value of 71.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004600 has a value of 71.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004701

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004701

64.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004701 has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004701 has a value of 64.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004702

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004702

73.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004702 has a value of 73.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004702 has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004801

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004801

73.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004801 has a value of 73.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004801 has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004802

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004802

68.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004802 has a value of 68.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004802 has a value of 68.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004901

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004901

71.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004901 has a value of 71.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004901 has a value of 71.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004902

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004902

66.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004902 has a value of 66.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004902 has a value of 66.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005001

71.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005001 has a value of 71.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005001 has a value of 71.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005002

68.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005002 has a value of 68.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005002 has a value of 68.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005201

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005201

73.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005201 has a value of 73.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005201 has a value of 73.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005301

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005301

74.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005301 has a value of 74.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005301 has a value of 74.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005500

73.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005500 has a value of 73.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005500 has a value of 73.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005600

71.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005600 has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005600 has a value of 71.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005800

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005800

71.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005800 has a value of 71.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005800 has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005900

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001005900

69.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005900 has a value of 69.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001005900 has a value of 69.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006202

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006202

0.0%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006202 has a value of 0.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (63.7%), 11001006202 has a value of 0.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(63.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006400

62.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006400 has a value of 62.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006400 has a value of 62.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006500

75.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006500 has a value of 75.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006500 has a value of 75.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006600

78.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006600 has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006600 has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006700

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006700

76.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006700 has a value of 76.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006700 has a value of 76.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006801

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006801

72.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006801 has a value of 72.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006801 has a value of 72.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006802

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006802

74.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006802 has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006802 has a value of 74.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006804

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006804

48.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006804 has a value of 48.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006804 has a value of 48.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006900

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001006900

76.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006900 has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001006900 has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007000

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007000

75.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007000 has a value of 75.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007000 has a value of 75.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007100

63.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007100 has a value of 63.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007100 has a value of 63.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007200

76.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007200 has a value of 76.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007200 has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007301

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007301

66.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007301 has a value of 66.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007301 has a value of 66.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007304

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007304

61.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007304 has a value of 61.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007304 has a value of 61.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007401

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007401

51.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007401 has a value of 51.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007401 has a value of 51.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007403

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007403

59.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007403 has a value of 59.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007403 has a value of 59.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007404

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007404

63.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007404 has a value of 63.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007404 has a value of 63.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007406

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007406

57.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007406 has a value of 57.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007406 has a value of 57.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007407

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007407

62.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007407 has a value of 62.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007407 has a value of 62.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007408

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007408

52.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007408 has a value of 52.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007408 has a value of 52.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007409

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007409

59.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007409 has a value of 59.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007409 has a value of 59.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007502

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007502

58.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007502 has a value of 58.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007502 has a value of 58.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007503

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007503

57.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007503 has a value of 57.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007503 has a value of 57.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007504

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007504

56.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007504 has a value of 56.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007504 has a value of 56.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007601

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007601

65.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007601 has a value of 65.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007601 has a value of 65.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007603

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007603

66.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007603 has a value of 66.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007603 has a value of 66.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007604

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007604

68.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007604 has a value of 68.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007604 has a value of 68.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007605

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007605

64.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007605 has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007605 has a value of 64.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007703

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007703

57.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007703 has a value of 57.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007703 has a value of 57.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007707

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007707

64.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007707 has a value of 64.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007707 has a value of 64.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007708

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007708

56.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007708 has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007708 has a value of 56.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007709

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007709

63.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007709 has a value of 63.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007709 has a value of 63.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007803

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007803

63.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007803 has a value of 63.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007803 has a value of 63.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007804

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007804

65.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007804 has a value of 65.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007804 has a value of 65.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007806

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007806

64.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007806 has a value of 64.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007806 has a value of 64.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007807

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007807

64.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007807 has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007807 has a value of 64.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007808

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007808

63.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007808 has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007808 has a value of 63.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007809

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007809

64.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007809 has a value of 64.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007809 has a value of 64.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007901

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007901

67.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007901 has a value of 67.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007901 has a value of 67.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007903

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001007903

70.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007903 has a value of 70.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001007903 has a value of 70.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008001

75.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008001 has a value of 75.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008001 has a value of 75.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008002

74.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008002 has a value of 74.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008002 has a value of 74.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008100

76.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008100 has a value of 76.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008100 has a value of 76.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008200

76.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008200 has a value of 76.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008200 has a value of 76.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008301

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008301

76.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008301 has a value of 76.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008301 has a value of 76.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008302

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008302

76.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008302 has a value of 76.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008302 has a value of 76.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008402

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008402

74.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008402 has a value of 74.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008402 has a value of 74.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008410

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008410

74.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008410 has a value of 74.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008410 has a value of 74.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008701

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008701

71.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008701 has a value of 71.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008701 has a value of 71.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008702

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008702

68.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008702 has a value of 68.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008702 has a value of 68.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008802

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008802

68.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008802 has a value of 68.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008802 has a value of 68.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008803

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008803

56.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008803 has a value of 56.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008803 has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008804

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008804

64.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008804 has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008804 has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008903

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008903

65.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008903 has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008903 has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008904

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001008904

62.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008904 has a value of 62.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001008904 has a value of 62.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009000

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009000

73.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009000 has a value of 73.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009000 has a value of 73.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009102

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009102

65.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009102 has a value of 65.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009102 has a value of 65.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009201

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009201

69.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009201 has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009201 has a value of 69.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009203

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009203

69.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009203 has a value of 69.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009203 has a value of 69.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009204

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009204

63.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009204 has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009204 has a value of 63.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009301

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009301

71.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009301 has a value of 71.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009301 has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009302

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009302

69.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009302 has a value of 69.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009302 has a value of 69.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009400

72.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009400 has a value of 72.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009400 has a value of 72.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009501

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009501

62.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009501 has a value of 62.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009501 has a value of 62.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009503

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009503

75.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009503 has a value of 75.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009503 has a value of 75.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009504

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009504

72.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009504 has a value of 72.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009504 has a value of 72.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009505

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009505

74.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009505 has a value of 74.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009505 has a value of 74.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009507

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009507

69.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009507 has a value of 69.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009507 has a value of 69.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009508

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009508

71.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009508 has a value of 71.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009508 has a value of 71.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009509

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009509

72.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009509 has a value of 72.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009509 has a value of 72.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009601

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009601

58.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009601 has a value of 58.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009601 has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009602

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009602

60.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009602 has a value of 60.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009602 has a value of 60.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009603

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009603

66.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009603 has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009603 has a value of 66.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009604

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009604

69.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009604 has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009604 has a value of 69.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009700

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009700

62.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009700 has a value of 62.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009700 has a value of 62.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009801

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009801

59.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009801 has a value of 59.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009801 has a value of 59.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009802

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009802

54.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009802 has a value of 54.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009802 has a value of 54.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009803

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009803

61.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009803 has a value of 61.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009803 has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009804

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009804

61.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009804 has a value of 61.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009804 has a value of 61.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009807

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009807

69.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009807 has a value of 69.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009807 has a value of 69.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009810

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009810

58.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009810 has a value of 58.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009810 has a value of 58.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009811

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009811

59.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009811 has a value of 59.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009811 has a value of 59.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009901

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009901

74.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009901 has a value of 74.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009901 has a value of 74.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009902

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009902

69.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009902 has a value of 69.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009902 has a value of 69.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009903

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009903

66.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009903 has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009903 has a value of 66.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009904

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009904

59.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009904 has a value of 59.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009904 has a value of 59.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009905

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009905

62.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009905 has a value of 62.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009905 has a value of 62.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009906

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009906

64.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009906 has a value of 64.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009906 has a value of 64.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009907

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001009907

59.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009907 has a value of 59.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001009907 has a value of 59.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010100

72.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010100 has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010100 has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010200

77.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010200 has a value of 77.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010200 has a value of 77.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010300

70.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010300 has a value of 70.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010300 has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010400

59.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010400 has a value of 59.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010400 has a value of 59.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010500

69.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010500 has a value of 69.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010500 has a value of 69.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010600

73.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010600 has a value of 73.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010600 has a value of 73.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010700

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010700

72.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010700 has a value of 72.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010700 has a value of 72.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010800

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010800

63.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010800 has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010800 has a value of 63.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010900

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001010900

61.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010900 has a value of 61.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001010900 has a value of 61.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001011000

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001011000

76.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011000 has a value of 76.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001011000 has a value of 76.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001011100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001011100

69.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011100 has a value of 69.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001011100 has a value of 69.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation City: District of Columbia

78.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), District of Columbia has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20001

78.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20001 has a value of 78.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20001 has a value of 78.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20002

78.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20002 has a value of 78.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20002 has a value of 78.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20003

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20003

78.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20003 has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20003 has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20004

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20004

77.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20004 has a value of 77.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20004 has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20005

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20005

78.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20005 has a value of 78.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20005 has a value of 78.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20006

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20006

72.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20006 has a value of 72.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20006 has a value of 72.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20007

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20007

80.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20007 has a value of 80.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20007 has a value of 80.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20008

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20008

81.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20008 has a value of 81.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20008 has a value of 81.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20009

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20009

78.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20009 has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20009 has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20010

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20010

76.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20010 has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20010 has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20011

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20011

78.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20011 has a value of 78.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20011 has a value of 78.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20012

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20012

79.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20012 has a value of 79.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20012 has a value of 79.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20015

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20015

81.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20015 has a value of 81.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20015 has a value of 81.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20016

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20016

80.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20016 has a value of 80.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20016 has a value of 80.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20017

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20017

79.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20017 has a value of 79.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20017 has a value of 79.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20018

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20018

79.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20018 has a value of 79.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20018 has a value of 79.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20019

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20019

74.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20019 has a value of 74.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20019 has a value of 74.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20020

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20020

73.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20020 has a value of 73.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20020 has a value of 73.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20024

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20024

79.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20024 has a value of 79.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20024 has a value of 79.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20032

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20032

72.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20032 has a value of 72.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20032 has a value of 72.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20036

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20036

78.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20036 has a value of 78.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20036 has a value of 78.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20037

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20037

78.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20037 has a value of 78.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20037 has a value of 78.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20052

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20052

76.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20052 has a value of 76.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20052 has a value of 76.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20057

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20057

75.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20057 has a value of 75.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20057 has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20064

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20064

71.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20064 has a value of 71.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20064 has a value of 71.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20307

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20307

67.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20307 has a value of 67.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20307 has a value of 67.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20317

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20317

84.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20317 has a value of 84.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20317 has a value of 84.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20373

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Zip Code: 20373

56.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20373 has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,310 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 20373 has a value of 56.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000100

81.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 81.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 81.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000201

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000201

75.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000201 has a value of 75.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 11001000201 has a value of 75.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000202

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000202

78.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000202 has a value of 78.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 11001000202 has a value of 78.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000300

79.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000300 has a value of 79.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 11001000300 has a value of 79.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000400

79.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000400 has a value of 79.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 11001000400 has a value of 79.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000501

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Census Tract: 11001000501

81.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000501 has a value of 81.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,300 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), 11001000501 has a value of 81.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.