Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Value
Compared to:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008200

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008200

84.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008200 has a value of 84.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008200 has a value of 84.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008301

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008301

87.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008301 has a value of 87.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008301 has a value of 87.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008302

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008302

87.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008302 has a value of 87.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008302 has a value of 87.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008402

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008402

86.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008402 has a value of 86.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008402 has a value of 86.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008410

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008410

89.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008410 has a value of 89.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008410 has a value of 89.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008701

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008701

86.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008701 has a value of 86.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008701 has a value of 86.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008702

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008702

87.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008702 has a value of 87.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008702 has a value of 87.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008802

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008802

85.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008802 has a value of 85.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008802 has a value of 85.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008803

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008803

73.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008803 has a value of 73.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008803 has a value of 73.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008804

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008804

84.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008804 has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008804 has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008903

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008903

85.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008903 has a value of 85.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008903 has a value of 85.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008904

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008904

84.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008904 has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008904 has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009000

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009000

85.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009000 has a value of 85.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009000 has a value of 85.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009102

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009102

85.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009102 has a value of 85.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009102 has a value of 85.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009201

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009201

84.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009201 has a value of 84.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009201 has a value of 84.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009203

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009203

85.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009203 has a value of 85.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009203 has a value of 85.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009204

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009204

83.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009204 has a value of 83.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009204 has a value of 83.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009301

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009301

86.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009301 has a value of 86.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009301 has a value of 86.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009302

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009302

86.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009302 has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009302 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009400

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009400

88.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009400 has a value of 88.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009400 has a value of 88.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009501

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009501

76.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009501 has a value of 76.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009501 has a value of 76.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009503

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009503

89.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009503 has a value of 89.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009503 has a value of 89.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009504

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009504

87.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009504 has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009504 has a value of 87.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009505

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009505

88.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009505 has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009505 has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009507

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009507

86.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009507 has a value of 86.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009507 has a value of 86.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009508

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009508

85.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009508 has a value of 85.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009508 has a value of 85.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009509

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009509

87.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009509 has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009509 has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009601

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009601

83.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009601 has a value of 83.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009601 has a value of 83.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009602

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009602

81.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009602 has a value of 81.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009602 has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009603

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009603

84.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009603 has a value of 84.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009603 has a value of 84.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009604

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009604

86.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009604 has a value of 86.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009604 has a value of 86.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009700

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009700

82.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009700 has a value of 82.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009700 has a value of 82.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009801

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009801

81.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009801 has a value of 81.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009801 has a value of 81.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009802

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009802

79.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009802 has a value of 79.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009802 has a value of 79.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009803

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009803

83.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009803 has a value of 83.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009803 has a value of 83.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009804

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009804

82.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009804 has a value of 82.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009804 has a value of 82.8%.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009807

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009807

85.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009807 has a value of 85.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009807 has a value of 85.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009810

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009810

82.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009810 has a value of 82.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009810 has a value of 82.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009811

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009811

80.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009811 has a value of 80.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009811 has a value of 80.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009901

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009901

88.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009901 has a value of 88.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009901 has a value of 88.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009902

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009902

86.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009902 has a value of 86.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009902 has a value of 86.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009903

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009903

86.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009903 has a value of 86.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009903 has a value of 86.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009904

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009904

82.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009904 has a value of 82.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009904 has a value of 82.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009905

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009905

83.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009905 has a value of 83.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009905 has a value of 83.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009906

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009906

84.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009906 has a value of 84.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009906 has a value of 84.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009907

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001009907

84.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009907 has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001009907 has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010100

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010100

82.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010100 has a value of 82.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010100 has a value of 82.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010200

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010200

87.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010200 has a value of 87.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010200 has a value of 87.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010300

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010300

86.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010300 has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010300 has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010400

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010400

81.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010400 has a value of 81.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010400 has a value of 81.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010500

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010500

84.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010500 has a value of 84.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010500 has a value of 84.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010600

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010600

85.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010600 has a value of 85.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010600 has a value of 85.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010700

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010700

77.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010700 has a value of 77.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010700 has a value of 77.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010800

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010800

56.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010800 has a value of 56.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010800 has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010900

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001010900

80.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010900 has a value of 80.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001010900 has a value of 80.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001011000

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001011000

88.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011000 has a value of 88.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001011000 has a value of 88.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001011100

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001011100

87.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011100 has a value of 87.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,315 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001011100 has a value of 87.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Cancer

Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate City: District of Columbia

16.1
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 16.1 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.4 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 721 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 16.1 which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.7 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 48 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), District of Columbia has a value of 16.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (16.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.6).
Prior Value
(20.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the District of Columbia value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Colon Cancer Screening

Value
Compared to:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20001

70.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20001 has a value of 70.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20001 has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20002

70.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20002 has a value of 70.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20002 has a value of 70.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20003

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20003

72.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20003 has a value of 72.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20003 has a value of 72.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20004

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20004

73.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20004 has a value of 73.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20004 has a value of 73.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20005

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20005

71.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20005 has a value of 71.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20005 has a value of 71.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20006

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20006

64.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20006 has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20006 has a value of 64.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20007

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20007

75.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20007 has a value of 75.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20007 has a value of 75.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20008

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20008

76.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20008 has a value of 76.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20008 has a value of 76.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20009

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20009

72.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20009 has a value of 72.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20009 has a value of 72.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20010

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20010

67.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20010 has a value of 67.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20010 has a value of 67.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20011

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20011

69.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20011 has a value of 69.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20011 has a value of 69.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20012

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20012

72.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20012 has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20012 has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20015

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20015

76.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20015 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20015 has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20016

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20016

75.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20016 has a value of 75.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20016 has a value of 75.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20017

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20017

70.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20017 has a value of 70.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20017 has a value of 70.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20018

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20018

70.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20018 has a value of 70.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20018 has a value of 70.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20019

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20019

63.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20019 has a value of 63.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20019 has a value of 63.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20020

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20020

62.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20020 has a value of 62.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20020 has a value of 62.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20024

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20024

72.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20024 has a value of 72.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20024 has a value of 72.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20032

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20032

61.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20032 has a value of 61.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20032 has a value of 61.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20036

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20036

73.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20036 has a value of 73.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20036 has a value of 73.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20037

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20037

72.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20037 has a value of 72.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20037 has a value of 72.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20052

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20052

67.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20052 has a value of 67.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20052 has a value of 67.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20057

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20057

69.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20057 has a value of 69.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20057 has a value of 69.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20064

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20064

63.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20064 has a value of 63.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20064 has a value of 63.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20307

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20307

60.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20307 has a value of 60.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20307 has a value of 60.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20317

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20317

76.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20317 has a value of 76.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20317 has a value of 76.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20373

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Zip Code: 20373

50.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20373 has a value of 50.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,309 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 20373 has a value of 50.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000100

76.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 76.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000100 has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000201

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000201

69.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000201 has a value of 69.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000201 has a value of 69.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000202

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000202

74.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000202 has a value of 74.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000202 has a value of 74.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000300

74.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000300 has a value of 74.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000300 has a value of 74.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000400

74.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000400 has a value of 74.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000400 has a value of 74.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000501

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000501

77.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000501 has a value of 77.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000501 has a value of 77.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000502

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000502

76.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000502 has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000502 has a value of 76.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000600

76.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000600 has a value of 76.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000600 has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000701

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000701

76.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000701 has a value of 76.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000701 has a value of 76.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000702

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000702

73.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000702 has a value of 73.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000702 has a value of 73.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000801

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000801

74.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000801 has a value of 74.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000801 has a value of 74.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000802

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000802

74.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000802 has a value of 74.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000802 has a value of 74.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000901

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000901

74.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000901 has a value of 74.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000901 has a value of 74.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000902

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001000902

75.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000902 has a value of 75.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001000902 has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001001

75.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001001 has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001001 has a value of 75.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001002

71.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001002 has a value of 71.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001002 has a value of 71.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001100

77.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001100 has a value of 77.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001100 has a value of 77.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001200

76.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001200 has a value of 76.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001200 has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001301

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001301

77.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001301 has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001301 has a value of 77.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001302

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001302

75.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001302 has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001302 has a value of 75.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001401

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001401

76.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001401 has a value of 76.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001401 has a value of 76.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001402

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001402

75.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001402 has a value of 75.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001402 has a value of 75.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001500

77.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001500 has a value of 77.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001500 has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001600

76.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001600 has a value of 76.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001600 has a value of 76.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001702

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001702

73.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001702 has a value of 73.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001702 has a value of 73.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001803

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001803

64.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001803 has a value of 64.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001803 has a value of 64.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001804

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001804

61.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001804 has a value of 61.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001804 has a value of 61.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001901

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001901

71.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001901 has a value of 71.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001901 has a value of 71.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001902

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001001902

71.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001902 has a value of 71.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001001902 has a value of 71.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002001

65.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002001 has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002001 has a value of 65.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002002

70.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002002 has a value of 70.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002002 has a value of 70.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002101

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002101

66.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002101 has a value of 66.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002101 has a value of 66.4%.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002102

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002102

70.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002102 has a value of 70.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002102 has a value of 70.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002201

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002201

69.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002201 has a value of 69.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002201 has a value of 69.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002202

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002202

68.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002202 has a value of 68.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002202 has a value of 68.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002301

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002301

72.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002301 has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002301 has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002302

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002302

72.1%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002302 has a value of 72.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002302 has a value of 72.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002400

72.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002400 has a value of 72.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002400 has a value of 72.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002501

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002501

67.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002501 has a value of 67.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002501 has a value of 67.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002502

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002502

65.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002502 has a value of 65.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002502 has a value of 65.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002600

76.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002600 has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002600 has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002701

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002701

70.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002701 has a value of 70.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002701 has a value of 70.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002702

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002702

68.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002702 has a value of 68.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002702 has a value of 68.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002801

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002801

64.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002801 has a value of 64.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002801 has a value of 64.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002802

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002802

64.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002802 has a value of 64.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002802 has a value of 64.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002900

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001002900

67.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002900 has a value of 67.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001002900 has a value of 67.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003000

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003000

68.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003000 has a value of 68.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003000 has a value of 68.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003100

68.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003100 has a value of 68.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003100 has a value of 68.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003200

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003200

67.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003200 has a value of 67.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003200 has a value of 67.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003301

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003301

74.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003301 has a value of 74.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003301 has a value of 74.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003302

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003302

74.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003302 has a value of 74.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003302 has a value of 74.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003400

68.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003400 has a value of 68.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003400 has a value of 68.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003500

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003500

69.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003500 has a value of 69.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003500 has a value of 69.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003600

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003600

69.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003600 has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003600 has a value of 69.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003700

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003700

62.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003700 has a value of 62.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003700 has a value of 62.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003800

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003800

71.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003800 has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003800 has a value of 71.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003900

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001003900

74.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003900 has a value of 74.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001003900 has a value of 74.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004001

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004001

76.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004001 has a value of 76.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004001 has a value of 76.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004002

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004002

76.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004002 has a value of 76.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004002 has a value of 76.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004100

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004100

77.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004100 has a value of 77.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004100 has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004201

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004201

73.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004201 has a value of 73.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004201 has a value of 73.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004202

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004202

76.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004202 has a value of 76.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004202 has a value of 76.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004300

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004300

73.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004300 has a value of 73.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004300 has a value of 73.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004400

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening Census Tract: 11001004400

73.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004400 has a value of 73.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,298 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), 11001004400 has a value of 73.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.