Home > Community Dashboard > Custom Dashboard

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Additional Search Options
Clear all search filters

Search Results:

Save a link to this search
Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Value
Compared to:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20002

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20002

86.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20002 has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20002 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20003

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20003

87.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20003 has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20003 has a value of 87.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20004

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20004

85.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20004 has a value of 85.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20004 has a value of 85.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20005

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20005

84.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20005 has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20005 has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20006

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20006

60.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20006 has a value of 60.4% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20006 has a value of 60.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20007

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20007

82.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20007 has a value of 82.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20007 has a value of 82.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20008

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20008

85.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20008 has a value of 85.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20008 has a value of 85.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20009

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20009

86.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20009 has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20009 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20010

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20010

83.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20010 has a value of 83.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20010 has a value of 83.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20011

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20011

86.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20011 has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20011 has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20012

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20012

87.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20012 has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20012 has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20015

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20015

88.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20015 has a value of 88.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20015 has a value of 88.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20016

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20016

85.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20016 has a value of 85.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20016 has a value of 85.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20017

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20017

86.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20017 has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20017 has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20018

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20018

86.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20018 has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20018 has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20019

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20019

83.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20019 has a value of 83.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20019 has a value of 83.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20020

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20020

83.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20020 has a value of 83.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20020 has a value of 83.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20024

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20024

86.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20024 has a value of 86.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20024 has a value of 86.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20032

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20032

81.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20032 has a value of 81.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20032 has a value of 81.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20036

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20036

84.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20036 has a value of 84.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20036 has a value of 84.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20037

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20037

75.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20037 has a value of 75.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20037 has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20052

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20052

54.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20052 has a value of 54.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20052 has a value of 54.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20057

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20057

54.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20057 has a value of 54.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20057 has a value of 54.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20064

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20064

55.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20064 has a value of 55.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20064 has a value of 55.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20307

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20307

79.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20307 has a value of 79.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20307 has a value of 79.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20317

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20317

84.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20317 has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20317 has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20319

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20319

75.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20319 has a value of 75.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20319 has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20373

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20373

79.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20373 has a value of 79.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20373 has a value of 79.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Zip Code: 20390

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20390

76.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20390 has a value of 76.3% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 20390 has a value of 76.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000100

87.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000100 has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000201

54.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000201 has a value of 54.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000201 has a value of 54.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000202

75.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000202 has a value of 75.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000202 has a value of 75.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000300

82.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000300 has a value of 82.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000300 has a value of 82.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000400

86.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000400 has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000400 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000501

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000501

85.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000501 has a value of 85.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000501 has a value of 85.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000502

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000502

86.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000502 has a value of 86.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000502 has a value of 86.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000600

87.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000600 has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000600 has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000701

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000701

86.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000701 has a value of 86.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000701 has a value of 86.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000702

83.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000702 has a value of 83.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000702 has a value of 83.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000801

85.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000801 has a value of 85.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000801 has a value of 85.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000802

86.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000802 has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000802 has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000901

84.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000901 has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000901 has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001000902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000902

89.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000902 has a value of 89.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001000902 has a value of 89.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001001

85.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001001 has a value of 85.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001001 has a value of 85.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001002

81.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001002 has a value of 81.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001002 has a value of 81.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001100

87.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001100 has a value of 87.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001100 has a value of 87.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001200

85.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001200 has a value of 85.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001200 has a value of 85.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001301

84.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001301 has a value of 84.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001301 has a value of 84.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001302

85.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001302 has a value of 85.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001302 has a value of 85.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001401

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001401

88.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001401 has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001401 has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001402

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001402

87.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001402 has a value of 87.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001402 has a value of 87.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001500

89.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001500 has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001500 has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001600

89.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001600 has a value of 89.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001600 has a value of 89.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001702

88.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001702 has a value of 88.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001702 has a value of 88.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001803

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001803

84.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001803 has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001803 has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001804

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001804

83.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001804 has a value of 83.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001804 has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001901

88.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001901 has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001901 has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001001902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001902

88.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001902 has a value of 88.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001001902 has a value of 88.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002001

83.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002001 has a value of 83.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002001 has a value of 83.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002002

86.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002002 has a value of 86.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002002 has a value of 86.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002101

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002101

85.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002101 has a value of 85.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002101 has a value of 85.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002102

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002102

87.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002102 has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002102 has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002201

86.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002201 has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002201 has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002202

87.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002202 has a value of 87.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002202 has a value of 87.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002301

88.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002301 has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002301 has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002302

81.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002302 has a value of 81.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002302 has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002400

87.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002400 has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002400 has a value of 87.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002501

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002501

85.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002501 has a value of 85.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002501 has a value of 85.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002502

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002502

84.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002502 has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002502 has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002600

89.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002600 has a value of 89.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002600 has a value of 89.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002701

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002701

84.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002701 has a value of 84.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002701 has a value of 84.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002702

84.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002702 has a value of 84.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002702 has a value of 84.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002801

81.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002801 has a value of 81.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002801 has a value of 81.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002802

81.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002802 has a value of 81.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002802 has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001002900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002900

85.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002900 has a value of 85.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001002900 has a value of 85.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003000

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003000

83.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003000 has a value of 83.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003000 has a value of 83.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003100

84.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003100 has a value of 84.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003100 has a value of 84.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003200

84.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003200 has a value of 84.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003200 has a value of 84.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003301

86.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003301 has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003301 has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003302

87.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003302 has a value of 87.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003302 has a value of 87.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003400

82.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003400 has a value of 82.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003400 has a value of 82.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003500

76.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003500 has a value of 76.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003500 has a value of 76.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003600

85.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003600 has a value of 85.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003600 has a value of 85.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003700

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003700

82.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003700 has a value of 82.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003700 has a value of 82.8%.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003800

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003800

87.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003800 has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003800 has a value of 87.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001003900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001003900

87.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001003900 has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001003900 has a value of 87.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004001

87.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004001 has a value of 87.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004001 has a value of 87.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004002

87.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004002 has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004002 has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004100

87.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004100 has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004100 has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004201

86.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004201 has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004201 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004202

86.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004202 has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004202 has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004300

86.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004300 has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004300 has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004400

87.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004400 has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004400 has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004600

86.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004600 has a value of 86.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004600 has a value of 86.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004701

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004701

82.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004701 has a value of 82.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004701 has a value of 82.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004702

86.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004702 has a value of 86.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004702 has a value of 86.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004801

85.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004801 has a value of 85.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004801 has a value of 85.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004802

82.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004802 has a value of 82.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004802 has a value of 82.8%.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004901

85.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004901 has a value of 85.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004901 has a value of 85.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001004902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001004902

84.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001004902 has a value of 84.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001004902 has a value of 84.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005001

86.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005001 has a value of 86.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005001 has a value of 86.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005002

83.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005002 has a value of 83.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005002 has a value of 83.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005201

86.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005201 has a value of 86.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005201 has a value of 86.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005301

86.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005301 has a value of 86.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005301 has a value of 86.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005500

83.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005500 has a value of 83.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005500 has a value of 83.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005600

73.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005600 has a value of 73.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005600 has a value of 73.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005800

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005800

83.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005800 has a value of 83.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005800 has a value of 83.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001005900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001005900

78.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001005900 has a value of 78.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001005900 has a value of 78.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006400

82.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006400 has a value of 82.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006400 has a value of 82.8%.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006500

85.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006500 has a value of 85.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006500 has a value of 85.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006600

87.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006600 has a value of 87.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006600 has a value of 87.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006700

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006700

88.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006700 has a value of 88.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006700 has a value of 88.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006801

88.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006801 has a value of 88.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006801 has a value of 88.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006802

89.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006802 has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006802 has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006804

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006804

80.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006804 has a value of 80.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006804 has a value of 80.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001006900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001006900

89.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001006900 has a value of 89.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001006900 has a value of 89.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007000

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007000

88.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007000 has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007000 has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007100

83.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007100 has a value of 83.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007100 has a value of 83.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007200

86.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007200 has a value of 86.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007200 has a value of 86.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007301

83.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007301 has a value of 83.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007301 has a value of 83.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007304

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007304

81.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007304 has a value of 81.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007304 has a value of 81.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007401

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007401

77.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007401 has a value of 77.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007401 has a value of 77.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007403

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007403

81.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007403 has a value of 81.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007403 has a value of 81.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007404

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007404

86.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007404 has a value of 86.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007404 has a value of 86.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007406

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007406

79.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007406 has a value of 79.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007406 has a value of 79.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007407

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007407

84.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007407 has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007407 has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007408

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007408

79.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007408 has a value of 79.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007408 has a value of 79.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007409

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007409

81.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007409 has a value of 81.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007409 has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007502

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007502

81.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007502 has a value of 81.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007502 has a value of 81.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007503

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007503

81.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007503 has a value of 81.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007503 has a value of 81.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007504

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007504

79.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007504 has a value of 79.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007504 has a value of 79.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007601

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007601

84.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007601 has a value of 84.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007601 has a value of 84.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007603

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007603

85.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007603 has a value of 85.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007603 has a value of 85.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007604

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007604

86.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007604 has a value of 86.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007604 has a value of 86.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007605

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007605

83.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007605 has a value of 83.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007605 has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007703

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007703

81.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007703 has a value of 81.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007703 has a value of 81.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007707

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007707

83.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007707 has a value of 83.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007707 has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007708

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007708

80.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007708 has a value of 80.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007708 has a value of 80.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007709

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007709

83.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007709 has a value of 83.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007709 has a value of 83.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007803

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007803

84.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007803 has a value of 84.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007803 has a value of 84.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007804

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007804

84.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007804 has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007804 has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007806

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007806

84.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007806 has a value of 84.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007806 has a value of 84.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007807

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007807

84.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007807 has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007807 has a value of 84.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007808

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007808

83.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007808 has a value of 83.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007808 has a value of 83.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007809

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007809

84.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007809 has a value of 84.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007809 has a value of 84.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007901

85.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007901 has a value of 85.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007901 has a value of 85.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001007903

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001007903

88.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001007903 has a value of 88.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001007903 has a value of 88.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008001

88.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008001 has a value of 88.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008001 has a value of 88.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008002

88.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008002 has a value of 88.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008002 has a value of 88.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 Census Tract: 11001008100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008100

88.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008100 has a value of 88.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value higher than 82.1% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.2%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), 11001008100 has a value of 88.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
Learn More
Save Card