Home > Community Dashboard > Custom Dashboard

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Additional Search Options
Clear all search filters

Search Results:

Save a link to this search
Turn Colorblind Mode On See the Legend

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Adults who Binge Drink

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008001

24.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008001 has a value of 24.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008001 has a value of 24.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008002

25.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008002 has a value of 25.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008002 has a value of 25.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008100

27.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008100 has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008100 has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008200

28.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008200 has a value of 28.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008200 has a value of 28.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008301

29.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008301 has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008301 has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008302

26.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008302 has a value of 26.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008302 has a value of 26.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008402

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008402

23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008402 has a value of 23.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008402 has a value of 23.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008410

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008410

24.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008410 has a value of 24.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008410 has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008701

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008701

22.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008701 has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008701 has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008702

19.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008702 has a value of 19.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008702 has a value of 19.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008802

18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008802 has a value of 18.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008802 has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008803

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008803

21.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008803 has a value of 21.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008803 has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008804

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008804

17.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008804 has a value of 17.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008804 has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008903

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008903

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008903 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008903 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001008904

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001008904

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001008904 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001008904 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009000

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009000

14.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009000 has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009000 has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009102

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009102

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009102 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009102 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009201

22.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009201 has a value of 22.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009201 has a value of 22.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009203

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009203

18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009203 has a value of 18.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009203 has a value of 18.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009204

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009204

17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009204 has a value of 17.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009204 has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009301

20.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009301 has a value of 20.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009301 has a value of 20.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009302

20.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009302 has a value of 20.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009302 has a value of 20.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009400

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009400 has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009400 has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009501

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009501

21.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009501 has a value of 21.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009501 has a value of 21.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009503

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009503

17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009503 has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009503 has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009504

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009504

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009504 has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009504 has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009505

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009505

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009505 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009505 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009507

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009507

15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009507 has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009507 has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009508

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009508

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009508 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009508 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009509

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009509

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009509 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009509 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009601

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009601

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009601 has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009601 has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009602

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009602

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009602 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009602 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009603

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009603

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009603 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009603 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009604

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009604

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009604 has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009604 has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009700

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009700

15.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009700 has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009700 has a value of 15.5%.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009801

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009801 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009801 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009802

15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009802 has a value of 15.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009802 has a value of 15.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009803

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009803

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009803 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009803 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009804

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009804

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009804 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009804 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009807

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009807

16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009807 has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009807 has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009810

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009810

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009810 has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009810 has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009811

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009811

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009811 has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009811 has a value of 16.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009901

14.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009901 has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009901 has a value of 14.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009902

16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009902 has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009902 has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009903

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009903

17.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009903 has a value of 17.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009903 has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009904

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009904

17.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009904 has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009904 has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009905

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009905

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009905 has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009905 has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009906

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009906

15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009906 has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009906 has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001009907

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001009907

17.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001009907 has a value of 17.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001009907 has a value of 17.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010100

25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010100 has a value of 25.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010100 has a value of 25.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010200

23.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010200 has a value of 23.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010200 has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010300

21.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010300 has a value of 21.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010300 has a value of 21.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010400

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010400 has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010400 has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010500

21.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010500 has a value of 21.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010500 has a value of 21.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010600

25.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010600 has a value of 25.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010600 has a value of 25.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010700

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010700

27.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010700 has a value of 27.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010700 has a value of 27.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010800

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010800

26.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010800 has a value of 26.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010800 has a value of 26.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001010900

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001010900

18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001010900 has a value of 18.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001010900 has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001011000

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001011000

20.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011000 has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001011000 has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults who Binge Drink Census Tract: 11001011100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001011100

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001011100 has a value of 16.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), 11001011100 has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

45.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 45.4 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 45.4 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (23.5), District of Columbia has a value of 45.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (45.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.2).
Prior Value
(42.2)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

56.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 56.7 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 56.7 which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9 while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.1.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (27.2), District of Columbia has a value of 56.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (6.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.5%).
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Drink at School

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Drink at School

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Drink at School City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

6.7%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.1%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.1%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Drink Before 13 Yrs Old

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Drink Before 13 Yrs Old

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Drink Before 13 Yrs Old City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

22.0%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.6%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (22.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.3%).
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Ever Drink Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Ever Drink Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Ever Drink Alcohol City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

58.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (66.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 58.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(66.2%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (58.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.3%).
Prior Value
(60.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Ever Use Marijuana

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Ever Use Marijuana

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Ever Use Marijuana City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

43.0%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 43.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(39.9%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Exchange Drugs at School

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Exchange Drugs at School

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Exchange Drugs at School City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

22.6%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (25.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 22.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who have Used Methamphetamines

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who have Used Methamphetamines

Value
Compared to:

Teens who have Used Methamphetamines City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 1.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 1.8%.
US Value
(1.8%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (1.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Alcohol City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), District of Columbia has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (15.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Cocaine

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Cocaine

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Cocaine City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

6.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), District of Columbia has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (6.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Ecstasy

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Ecstasy

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Ecstasy City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

7.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (7.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.8%).
Prior Value
(4.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Heroin

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Heroin

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Heroin City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

4.3%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 4.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.2%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Inhalants to Get High

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Inhalants to Get High

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Inhalants to Get High City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

13.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.9%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (13.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Marijuana at School

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Marijuana at School

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Marijuana at School City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

7.9%
(2011)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), District of Columbia has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.9%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Marijuana Before 13 Yrs Old

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Marijuana Before 13 Yrs Old

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Marijuana Before 13 Yrs Old City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

17.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), District of Columbia has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (17.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Marijuana: High School Students

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Marijuana: High School Students

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Marijuana: High School Students City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

20.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, District of Columbia has a value of 20.2% which is in the worst 25% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. States
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 20.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (20.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.2%).
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Over time, the District of Columbia value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Prescription Drugs

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Prescription Drugs

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Prescription Drugs City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

13.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), District of Columbia has a value of 13.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.8%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (13.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Steroids

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Teens who Use Steroids

Value
Compared to:

Teens who Use Steroids City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

4.5%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), District of Columbia has a value of 4.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.2%)
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (4.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.9%).
Prior Value
(3.9%)
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Youth who have Used Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Youth who have Used Alcohol

Value
Compared to:

Youth who have Used Alcohol City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

11.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (11.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Youth who have Used Marijuana

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Youth who have Used Marijuana

Value
Compared to:

Youth who have Used Marijuana City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

2.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, District of Columbia (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Over time, the District of Columbia value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
Learn More
Save Card

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Cancer City: District of Columbia

Current Value:

City: District of Columbia

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, District of Columbia has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of cities. Cities in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while cities in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), District of Columbia has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20001

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20001

3.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20001 has a value of 3.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20001 has a value of 3.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20002

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20002

4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20002 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20002 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20003

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20003

4.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20003 has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20003 has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20004

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20004

4.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20004 has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20004 has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20005

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20005

3.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20005 has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20005 has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20006

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20006

1.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20006 has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20006 has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20007

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20007

5.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20007 has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20007 has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20008

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20008

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20008 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20008 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20009

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20009

3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20009 has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20009 has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20010

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20010

4.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20010 has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20010 has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20011

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20011

5.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20011 has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20011 has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20012

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20012

6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20012 has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20012 has a value of 6.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20015

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20015

8.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20015 has a value of 8.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20015 has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20016

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20016

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20016 has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20016 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20017

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20017

6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20017 has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20017 has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20018

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20018

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20018 has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20018 has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20019

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20019

5.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20019 has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20019 has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20020

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20020

5.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20020 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20020 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20024

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20024

6.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20024 has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20024 has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20032

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20032

4.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20032 has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20032 has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20036

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20036

3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20036 has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20036 has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20037

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20037

3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20037 has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20037 has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20052

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20052

1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20052 has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20052 has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20057

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20057

0.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20057 has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20057 has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20064

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20064

1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20064 has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20064 has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20307

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20307

1.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20307 has a value of 1.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20307 has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20317

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20317

19.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20317 has a value of 19.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20317 has a value of 19.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20319

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20319

0.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20319 has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20319 has a value of 0.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20373

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20373

1.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20373 has a value of 1.3% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20373 has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Zip Code: 20390

Current Value:

Zip Code: 20390

0.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 20390 has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
U.S. Zip Codes
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 20390 has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000100

7.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000100 has a value of 7.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000100 has a value of 7.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000201

1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000201 has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000201 has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000202

4.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000202 has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000202 has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000300

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000300

4.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000300 has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000300 has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000400

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000400 has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000400 has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000501

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000501

4.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000501 has a value of 4.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000501 has a value of 4.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000502

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000502

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000502 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000502 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000600

7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000600 has a value of 7.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000600 has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000701

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000701

8.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000701 has a value of 8.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000701 has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000702

4.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000702 has a value of 4.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000702 has a value of 4.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000801

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000801

7.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000801 has a value of 7.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000801 has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000802

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000802

5.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000802 has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000802 has a value of 5.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000901

5.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000901 has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000901 has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001000902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001000902

8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001000902 has a value of 8.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001000902 has a value of 8.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001001

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001001 has a value of 6.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001001 has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001002

4.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001002 has a value of 4.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001002 has a value of 4.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001100

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001100

8.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001100 has a value of 8.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001100 has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001200

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001200

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001200 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001200 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001301

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001301 has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001301 has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001302

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001302 has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001302 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001401

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001401

7.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001401 has a value of 7.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001401 has a value of 7.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001402

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001402

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001402 has a value of 9.3% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001402 has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001500

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001500

9.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001500 has a value of 9.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001500 has a value of 9.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001600

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001600

8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001600 has a value of 8.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001600 has a value of 8.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001702

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001702

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001702 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001702 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001803

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001803

5.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001803 has a value of 5.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001803 has a value of 5.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001804

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001804

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001804 has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001804 has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001901

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001901

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001901 has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001901 has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001001902

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001001902

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001001902 has a value of 7.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001001902 has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002001

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002001

5.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002001 has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002001 has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002002

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002002

5.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002002 has a value of 5.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002002 has a value of 5.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002101

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002101

5.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002101 has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002101 has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002102

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002102

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002102 has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002102 has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002201

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002201

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002201 has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002201 has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002202

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002202

5.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002202 has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002202 has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002301

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002301

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002301 has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002301 has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002302

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002302

11.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002302 has a value of 11.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002302 has a value of 11.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card

Adults with Cancer Census Tract: 11001002400

Current Value:

Census Tract: 11001002400

5.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 11001002400 has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6%.
U.S. Census Tracts
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), 11001002400 has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
Learn More
Save Card